Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 21:43:50 -0400 From: Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org> To: FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: large RAID volume partition strategy Message-ID: <3A05E0E7-403E-4203-9B9B-AC78549D4E17@khera.org> In-Reply-To: <b41c75520708171510i38594117sc55dfabf06ea302@mail.gmail.com> References: <31BB09D7-B58A-47AC-8DD1-6BB8141170D8@khera.org> <b41c75520708171510i38594117sc55dfabf06ea302@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Aug 17, 2007, at 6:10 PM, Claus Guttesen wrote: > If you want to avoid the long fsck-times your remaining options are a > journaling filesystem or zfs, either requires an upgrade from freebsd > 6.2. I have used zfs and had a serverstop due to powerutage in out > area. Our zfs-samba-server came up fine with no data corruption. So I > will suggest freebsd 7.0 with zfs. Interesting idea... But, if I don't go with zfs, which would be a better way to slice the space up: RAID volumes exported as individual disks to freebsd, or one RAID volume divided into multiple logical partitions with disklabel?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3A05E0E7-403E-4203-9B9B-AC78549D4E17>