Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 10:48:22 -0600 From: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com> To: Luciano Mannucci <luciano@vespaperitivo.it> Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: 10.4 RELEASE sees only one core Message-ID: <CA%2BtpaK1vpKK1xxndG759mh%2BsLKDWYmYzteupXbSF0mFfP4CvHw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3zGtBY1tjWz3jYyh@baobab.bilink.it> References: <3zGnrf2wGvz3jYpX@baobab.bilink.it> <CA%2BtpaK2xNqGoNmUsw7PpWoSagSh8bCSZXijn%2B6ULOWHsEiW6Nw@mail.gmail.com> <3zGtBY1tjWz3jYyh@baobab.bilink.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 9:25 AM, Luciano Mannucci <luciano@vespaperitivo.it> wrote: > On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 08:30:23 -0600 > Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I think 11.x is better at this but: > Why? The Xeon E5410 went End Of Life in Q4 2010. Maybe the 9.something > looks more apropriate... :) > It has nothing do with your CPU which in and of itself is fully supported in 10.x > BTW, thanks I've missed that: > > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2014-May/050353.html > > tough I have only 8 cores in total, which seems to me way under 64. > I think you assume too much by taking the var name literally. -- Adam
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BtpaK1vpKK1xxndG759mh%2BsLKDWYmYzteupXbSF0mFfP4CvHw>