From owner-freebsd-current Tue Oct 13 04:55:57 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA14414 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Tue, 13 Oct 1998 04:55:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from implode.root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id EAA14407 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 1998 04:55:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from root@implode.root.com) Received: from implode.root.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by implode.root.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA12696; Tue, 13 Oct 1998 04:54:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199810131154.EAA12696@implode.root.com> To: Chuck Robey cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/cam/scsi scsi_da.c src/sys/i386/i386 busdma_machdep.c vm_machdep.c src/sys/i386/ibcs2 imgact_coff.c src/sys/i386/include param.h src/sys/i386/isa isa.c wd.c src/sys/kern imgact_elf.c sys_pipe.c sysv_shm.c vfs_bio.c ... In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 13 Oct 1998 07:46:21 EDT." From: David Greenman Reply-To: dg@root.com Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1998 04:54:04 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >On Tue, 13 Oct 1998, David Greenman wrote: > >> dg 1998/10/13 01:24:45 PDT >> >> Modified files: >> sys/cam/scsi scsi_da.c >> sys/i386/i386 busdma_machdep.c vm_machdep.c >> sys/i386/ibcs2 imgact_coff.c >> sys/i386/include param.h >> sys/i386/isa isa.c wd.c >> sys/kern imgact_elf.c sys_pipe.c sysv_shm.c >> vfs_bio.c vfs_subr.c >> sys/vm default_pager.c device_pager.c >> swap_pager.c vm_glue.c vm_map.c vm_mmap.c >> vm_pager.c vm_pager.h vm_unix.c >> vnode_pager.c vnode_pager.h >> Log: >> Fixed two potentially serious classes of bugs: > >David, I'm having the inetd type problem on a system I can't bring to >current, it's using a kernel from back in August, but I was wondering if >it might be worth my while to see if these changes might possibly >backport that far, without breaking other things. Could I get your >non-binding guess on that, would it be worth my time to see if I could >do that? > >It's the problem that seems to be caused by starvation. It shouldn't be too difficult to port the changes to an August kernel. It is possible that this commit might fix the problem, but I'm fairly skeptical. It would probably be wise to wait and see if someone who is running up-to-date -current and was having the inetd problem can do some testing first. If the problem persists for them, then you'll save some porting work. -DG David Greenman Co-founder/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message