From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 16 19:03:10 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 217CDFA9; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 19:03:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [IPv6:2001:470:1f11:75::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA6F52B44; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 19:03:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E11FFB941; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 15:03:07 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: random(4) plugin infrastructure for mulitple RNG in a modular fashion Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 14:02:05 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-CBSD-20110714-p28; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: <20130807183112.GA79319@dragon.NUXI.org> <86siyakqow.fsf@nine.des.no> <20130816172904.GF76666@x96.org> In-Reply-To: <20130816172904.GF76666@x96.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201308161402.05688.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Fri, 16 Aug 2013 15:03:08 -0400 (EDT) Cc: Arthur Mesh , Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav , secteam@freebsd.org, Philip Paeps X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 19:03:10 -0000 On Friday, August 16, 2013 1:29:04 pm Arthur Mesh wrote: > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:03:43AM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote: > > > If so, I'll ask obrien@ to commit it and note the change in > > > UPDATING. Also, how do we deal with i386/amd64 specific devices in > > > LINT? > > > > Not sure what you mean by that. > > I thought it would be prudent to add rdrand_rng/padlock_rng devices in > to LINT kernel. But since both of these devices are platform specific > (amd64/i386), I am not sure about the preferred way to accomplish that. You can put the relevant entries in sys/{amd64,i386}/conf/NOTES. LINT is generated by concatenating sys/conf/NOTES and sys/${arch}/conf/NOTES. -- John Baldwin