From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 7 20:14:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7042316A4E9 for ; Mon, 7 Aug 2006 20:14:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from omr3.networksolutionsemail.com (omr3.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B5F743D7C for ; Mon, 7 Aug 2006 20:14:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from mail.networksolutionsemail.com (ns-omr3.mgt.netsolmail.com [10.49.6.66]) by omr3.networksolutionsemail.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k77KEUlE003530 for ; Mon, 7 Aug 2006 16:14:30 -0400 Received: (qmail 12187 invoked by uid 78); 7 Aug 2006 20:14:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.1.1.60?) (racerx@makeworld.com@71.113.145.25) by ns-omr3.lb.hosting.dc2.netsol.com with SMTP; 7 Aug 2006 20:14:30 -0000 Message-ID: <44D79F20.6020702@makeworld.com> Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 15:14:24 -0500 From: Chris User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060807003815.C7522@ganymede.hub.org> <20060807145507.3ee1f55d@localhost> <44D79E13.5000204@makeworld.com> In-Reply-To: <44D79E13.5000204@makeworld.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 OpenPGP: id=C01BC363 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: BSDstats Project v2.0 ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: racerx@makeworld.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 20:14:39 -0000 Chris wrote: > Mark Kane wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 07, 2006, at 00:42:27 -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: >>> I've now committed v2.0 of the 300.statistics periodic script ... >>> this one adds the device reporting that we'd talked about previously,= >>> and the summary reports now reflect the driver(s) in use for those >>> deciding to report ... >> Great project idea, and glad to see it's growing :). Every time I >> refresh the page to check a host I add, I see several more since the >> last refresh just a few minutes before. The new percentage display add= ed >> in the last few minutes is nice too. >> >> I haven't followed the whole thread so I'm not sure if this has been >> suggested yet or not, but my idea would be to make another table >> of just the major releases. Like an easy view on who's running >> 6.1-RELEASE regardless of patch numbers, or 5.5-RELEASE, or >> 4.11-RELEASE, just so people can get a quick idea on who's running >> which releases without having to look through every one including >> patch levels (kind of a quick summary). Or maybe even numbers and >> percentages for "4.x", vs "5.x", vs "6.x", etc, and another table for >> "i386", "amd64", "sparc64", etc, so companies providing drivers or >> closed source binaries can quickly see the numbers for those. >> >> Just an idea :) >> >> -Mark >> >=20 >=20 > Just my .02 worth - that Sparc64 listing .... Is mine > Wheee! >=20 >=20 Let me clearify - 6.1-RELEASE sparc64 1 0.47% That one is mine. --=20 Best regards, Chris Ignorance should be painful.