From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 24 18:17:16 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07D0B37B71D; Mon, 24 Jul 2000 18:17:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (kris@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id SAA38023; Mon, 24 Jul 2000 18:17:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: kris owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 18:17:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway To: Larry Rosenman Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: openSSH 2.1 vs. 2.1.1 In-Reply-To: <200007240151.e6O1ptk09849@lerami.lerctr.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 23 Jul 2000, Larry Rosenman wrote: > Is there a timeframe when openSSH 2.1.1 will be in the > RELENG_4 tree as opposed to ports? A few weeks, probably. I don't think there are any major fixes.. > There (apparently) is an issue with compatibility from > 2.1.1p4 (on my UnixWare box), and the stock 2.1 (from RELENG_4 today). ..however, this sounds odd. There should not be any differences between the port and the base system version other than the updated vendor code (i.e. they have the same FreeBSD-specific changes), and it sounds bad on the part of the OpenSSH guys if 2.1 is incompatible with 2.1.1. Can you provide more details? Kris -- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message