Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 21:55:53 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 200582] [NEW PORT] textproc/kibana4: Browser based analytics and search interface to ElasticSearch Message-ID: <bug-200582-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200582 Bug ID: 200582 Summary: [NEW PORT] textproc/kibana4: Browser based analytics and search interface to ElasticSearch Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: kozlov.sergey.404@gmail.com Created attachment 157354 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=157354&action=edit Port's shar archive There is the textproc/kibana port already, but the new, 4th version is completely different from the 3rd one, so I've decided it should be another port. The WWWDIR is overridden, if not - the files of 3rd and 4th kibanas' mix up in ${PREFIX}/www/kibana directory without causing a conflict, which seems bad for me. The port fetches the Linux x86 version, but it can be any version elastic provides, it doesn't mean the port is for x86 only. The difference in kibana4 versions on elastic website is in the bundled node binaries, which are not copied alongside the application by the port. The port depends on node010, because that's the version elastic bundles inside their platform-specific downloads. I made some smoke testing on node 0.12, and they are fine, but decided to follow the elastic's style anyway. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-200582-13>