From owner-freebsd-ports  Sun Mar 19 22:11:13 1995
Return-Path: ports-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id WAA04007 for ports-outgoing; Sun, 19 Mar 1995 22:11:13 -0800
Received: from precipice.Shockwave.COM (precipice.shockwave.com [171.69.108.33]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id WAA04000; Sun, 19 Mar 1995 22:11:10 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by precipice.Shockwave.COM (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id WAA03069; Sun, 19 Mar 1995 22:10:34 -0800
Message-Id: <199503200610.WAA03069@precipice.Shockwave.COM>
To: nate@sneezy.sri.com (Nate Williams)
cc: Steven Wallace <swallace@newport.ece.uci.edu>,
        CVS-commiters@freefall.cdrom.com, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin/ld shlib.c 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 19 Mar 1995 23:07:06 MST."
             <199503200607.XAA06094@trout.sri.MT.net> 
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 1995 22:10:20 -0800
From: Paul Traina <pst@shockwave.com>
Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Let me try a different tact.  Would you agree that our cc should behave in
the same fashion as NetBSD/386's cc and BSD/386's cc or do you think that
FreeBSD should differ from *BSD?