From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Nov 20 9:35:49 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from sabre.velocet.net (sabre.velocet.net [198.96.118.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E4D837B479 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2000 09:35:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from office.tor.velocet.net (trooper.velocet.net [204.138.45.2]) by sabre.velocet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F2CB137F5D for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2000 12:33:51 -0500 (EST) Received: (from dgilbert@localhost) by office.tor.velocet.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA32820; Mon, 20 Nov 2000 12:35:43 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from dgilbert) From: David Gilbert MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14873.24814.809777.555306@trooper.velocet.net> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 12:35:42 -0500 (EST) To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Can I expect INVARIANTS and VINUM to play well together? X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 20.4 "Emerald" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Some time ago in stable, I removed INVARIANTS and INVARIANT_SUPPORT from the kernel because vinum wasn't happy with this configuration. I've now come back to a point in my debugging that I'd like to turn these back on, but I need to know if VINUM will be happy with them. Dave. -- ============================================================================ |David Gilbert, Velocet Communications. | Two things can only be | |Mail: dgilbert@velocet.net | equal if and only if they | |http://www.velocet.net/~dgilbert | are precisely opposite. | =========================================================GLO================ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message