From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 18:14:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2F2B1065694 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 18:14:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from srandall52@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83E808FC17 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 18:14:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk8 with SMTP id 8so122532gxk.13 for ; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 10:14:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:reply-to:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=f+3oetShcpyqW0KPUk3ffgCtPUVgoJ5bbEQmeN3Jrag=; b=mPuEVAOB+XFaAFKvmilX/hcBSAoaow1aYDV6f1zgKzr/7N91Z2ODHRlhL+uDT+CvnS Hb06Q3yW++c8mbAs0D9YTExnQ9l1nXshH8WBFMZ0OPK2OAvllGg/oTh0pY06o3EkbTLC cNv9Vh5wEBMt3I5B7uzbRrQc0pgVGFT7qVlIw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=rroXPn3RSdRs4E303D8eG7ngKo9pA44mdQLGUwnAU6jMIVLWd4VutTJ6L9ckWU5OWT UBaKzw9n5OXXG3g0qGBmFkex0HpZhYbSRe/q53JK73Wy/C4PvxozSv8rPxjWRxhKrC09 /zKIMMc9BJthYvieTz1p7dgfECr+tW/sYKkaM= Received: by 10.90.63.6 with SMTP id l6mr12667833aga.125.1296670490576; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 10:14:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from locust.local (adsl-68-88-175-232.dsl.wchtks.swbell.net [68.88.175.232]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 49sm6168213yhl.43.2011.02.02.10.14.47 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 02 Feb 2011 10:14:48 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 12:14:46 -0600 From: Steve Randall To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110202121446.6f6a10cd@locust.local> In-Reply-To: References: <20110202153805.40db05f8@gmail.com> <20110202090329.7ee4a4ab@locust.local> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.22.1; i386-portbld-freebsd8.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [CFT] cpu stresser^W libreoffice 3.3.0 final X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 18:14:51 -0000 On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:57:47 +0100 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > 2011/2/2 Steve Randall : > > On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:13:01 +0100 > > Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > >> 2011/2/2 Sergey V. Dyatko : > >> > On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 15:06:06 +0100 > >> > Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >> > > >> >> Hi all > >> >> > >> >> I ported libreoffice 3.3.0, you can find it here: > >> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/libreoffice.shar or > >> >> http://git.etoilebsd.net/ports/tree/libreoffice > >> >> > >> >> Can you please test it? > >> >> > >> >> by default it builds without java. it only lacks kde and gnome > >> >> integration. (sorry but my poor CPU already hates enough :)) > >> >> > >> >> All languages supported are build. > >> >> > >> >> I try to avoid as much as possible bundled libraries which gives a > >> >> pretty fast compiling libreoffice (on a Q6600: ~2h without java, ~3= h30 > >> >> with java) > >> >> > >> >> at this points : > >> >> there is (I guess) only one remaining problem : > >> >> which launching libreoffice it can't find it libraries, I haven't > >> >> decided yet wether to add LD_LIBRARY_PATH to the wrapper script or = to > >> >> add ldconfig -m ${PREFIX}/lib/libreoffice/ure/lib and ldconfig -m > >> >> ${PREFIX}/lib/libreoffice/base3.3/program > >> >> > >> >> maybe it conflicts with openoffice I haven't checked yet. > >> >> > >> >> to test it you will need a fresh ports tree (the needed libtextcat > >> >> modification was committed yesterday thanks thierry@) > >> >> > >> >> the mandatory screenshot : > >> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/libreoffice-3.3.0-final.png > >> >> > >> >> I expect to be able to push it in the tree during next week (after > >> >> finding a good way to deal with the libraries and checked if it > >> >> conflicts with openoffice) > >> >> > >> >> I would like to thanks Robert Nagy from openbsd, he has made all the > >> >> hard work :), he was also very helpful. > >> >> > >> > > >> > Thanks for work! > > > > I second that. > > > > > >> > > >> > I have one comment: > >> > > >> > [tiger@tiger]~%pkg_info -xI libreo > >> > libreoffice-3.3.0 =C2=A0 Full integrated office productivity suite > >> > > >> > now I'm trying `pkg_create -b libreoffice-3.3.0` but got errors: > >> > > >> > tiger# pkg_create -b libreoffice-3.3.0 > >> > tar: lib/libreoffice/basis3.3/program/basprovfx.uno.so: Cannot stat:= No > >> > such file or directory > >> > tar: > >> > lib/libreoffice/basis3.3/program/deploymentfx.uno.so: Cannot stat: No > >> > such file or directory > >> > > >> > [tiger@tiger]~%pkg_info -xL libreo |grep basprovfx.uno.so > >> > /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/basis3.3/program/basprovfx.uno.so > >> > > >> > [tiger@tiger]~%file /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/basis3.3/program/basp= rovfx.uno.so > >> > /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/basis3.3/program/basprovfx.uno.so: cannot > >> > open `/usr/local/lib/libreoffice/basis3.3/program/basprovfx.uno.so' = (No > >> > such file or directory) > >> > > >> > tiger# find work/ -type f -name basprovfx.uno.so > >> > tiger# pwd > >> > /usr/ports/editors/libreoffice > >> > > >> > broken pkg-plist ? > >> > > >> >> regards, > >> >> Bapt > >> > > >> > -- > >> > wbr, tiger > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > >> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > >> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.= org" > >> > > >> > >> seems like but I really don't know how to figure out what you have or > >> have not in your box that prevent basprovfx.uno.so and consors to be > >> built > > > > Have you tried building on i386? It looks like you generated the > > packing list on amd64. I'm not sure if that explains basprovfx.uno.so, > > but it's definitely a problem. > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > Yes I did try on i386. I have no problem installing, reinstalling, or using LO on i386, except that I get many warning messages on the uninstall. But pkg_info -g counts 178 missing files. 19 have "x86_64" in their paths. These directories do not exist on my system, but I have directories with "x86" in the names instead. (But there are 57 such lines in pkg-plist. It looks like each file is listed three times.) Also, instead of basprovfx.uno.so, I have basprovfi.uno.so. In fact, it looks like I have 159 "fi" files, where I see 159 "fx" files in pkg-plist.