From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 13 06:22:55 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B97E916A4CE for ; Fri, 13 May 2005 06:22:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from capable.rogards.com (63-255-228-251.ip.mcleodusa.net [63.255.228.251]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03B9B43D3F for ; Fri, 13 May 2005 06:22:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rbeyer@capable.rogards.com) Received: from capable.rogards.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by capable.rogards.com (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j4D6gqSb067525 for ; Fri, 13 May 2005 01:42:52 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rbeyer@capable.rogards.com) Received: (from rbeyer@localhost) by capable.rogards.com (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j4D6gp1D067524 for ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 13 May 2005 01:42:51 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rbeyer) Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 01:42:51 -0500 From: "Ross A. Beyer" To: ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050513064251.GA67308@capable.rogards.com> References: <200505120432.52170.lofi@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200505120432.52170.lofi@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: opendx-4.3.2_4 port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 06:22:55 -0000 ports list, My apologies for not understanding. I was simply following the instructions in section 4.7 of the Handbook, "Send email to the maintainer of the port first." I suppose there should be a clause there that says "unless the maintainer is listed as ports@FreeBSD.org, in which case, go directly to the send-pr step. I suppose I should use send-pr to submit this to the docs category, but there may be other issues relevant to that issue that I may not be cognizant of. On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 04:05:29AM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > You may take the maintainership and/or write a PR on the > case. Handbook, Portersbook and man send-pr are your friends. That's > how this great and free software is going on. I'm afraid that I don't feel comfortable enough with the Porter's Handbook to become the maintainer, I'll submit the PR. On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 04:32:47AM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libdf.so.1" not found, required by > "startupui" > > > > The libdf.so library is a part of the science/hdf port. ?Installation > > of the hdf FreeBSD port then allowed proper function of opendx. > > > > So it appears that the science/hdf port needs to be added as a > > requirement for the graphics/opendx port. > > That dependency is already present in the current port. Hmmm, I do see that enclosed in an ".if defined" statement, but I can't say that I understand how all of the make targets interact. All I can say is that I added the package (with portinstall -NPRv), and the science/hdf port was not installed. I'll detail that in the PR. Thanks for pointing it out. -- Ross