From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Jul 12 09:10:39 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id JAA10357 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 12 Jul 1995 09:10:39 -0700 Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.34]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id JAA10338 ; Wed, 12 Jul 1995 09:10:22 -0700 Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.6.9/8.6.9) id CAA31521; Thu, 13 Jul 1995 02:05:28 +1000 Date: Thu, 13 Jul 1995 02:05:28 +1000 From: Bruce Evans Message-Id: <199507121605.CAA31521@godzilla.zeta.org.au> To: bde@zeta.org.au, rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com Subject: Re: Help me please.. :) Cc: current@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, root@debian.cps.cmich.edu Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >> There are two bugs here: >There is one bug here. >> 1) ... >> 2) FreeBSD releases have /usr/include/machine populated with files. It >> should be a symlink to /sys/i386/include to avoid update problems. >This is not a bug, realize that without the src release installed if we >did this you could not use the system for compiling. Bill did that >... >We need to ``enhance'' the installation of the src tree, that is where >the bug lies. When a src tree is installed then and only then should There are hundreds of bugs here :-). We need to support multiple machines someday. Then files in /usr/include/machine can't work even if it is a symlink. A symlink is still better because it can be changed much faster. Bruce