From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Nov 7 20:09:20 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id UAA17012 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 7 Nov 1995 20:09:20 -0800 Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id UAA16999 for ; Tue, 7 Nov 1995 20:09:11 -0800 Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id VAA19043; Tue, 7 Nov 1995 21:04:38 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199511080404.VAA19043@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: ideas from netbsd To: cimaxp1!jb@werple.net.au (John Birrell) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 1995 21:04:38 -0700 (MST) Cc: terry@lambert.org, hackers@freebsd.org, jb@cimlogic.com.au In-Reply-To: <199511080134.MAA06137@werple.net.au> from "John Birrell" at Nov 8, 95 12:37:24 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 622 Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > > The NetBSD "thread environment" consists of both CAP's pthreads code > > AND a thread safe libc, etc.. > > My understanding of the way things are: > > NetBSD "thread environment" = CAP's pthreads code including CAP's thread safe > libc. > > FreeBSD "thread environment" = CAP's pthreads code including CAP's thread safe > libc. Your understanding is incorrect according to Julian's post under this same subject. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.