From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 6 13:52:24 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7534137B401; Fri, 6 Jun 2003 13:52:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rwcrmhc52.attbi.com (rwcrmhc52.attbi.com [216.148.227.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C63A043FBD; Fri, 6 Jun 2003 13:52:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmah@employees.org) Received: from bmah.dyndns.org (12-240-204-110.client.attbi.com[12.240.204.110]) by attbi.com (rwcrmhc52) with ESMTP id <2003060620522305200mvdv2e>; Fri, 6 Jun 2003 20:52:23 +0000 Received: from intruder.bmah.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bmah.dyndns.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h56KqM9c049650; Fri, 6 Jun 2003 13:52:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmah@intruder.bmah.org) Received: (from bmah@localhost) by intruder.bmah.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h56KqMAd049649; Fri, 6 Jun 2003 13:52:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 13:52:22 -0700 From: "Bruce A. Mah" To: Sean Chittenden Message-ID: <20030606205222.GA49614@intruder.bmah.org> References: <20030606175954.GQ65470@perrin.int.nxad.com> <3EE0DBEC.F32AF559@pipeline.ch> <200306061829.h56IT59c048678@bmah.dyndns.org> <20030606.132404.126768734.imp@bsdimp.com> <20030606192946.GR65470@perrin.int.nxad.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="T4sUOijqQbZv57TR" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030606192946.GR65470@perrin.int.nxad.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Image-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/Images/bmah-cisco-small.gif X-url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/ cc: "M. Warner Losh" cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Way forward with BIND 8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 20:52:24 -0000 --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If memory serves me right, Sean Chittenden wrote: > > : > -CURRENT and 5.1R remove BIND8 from contrib. User will have to > > : > install from ports whatever pleases him/her (bind8.3, bind8.4, bi= nd9, > > : > djbdns, maradns, ...). > > : >=20 > > : > -CURRENT and 5.1R import BIND9 Resolver (IPv6 aware if you wish). > > :=20 > > : It is way too late to make changes of this sort for 5.1-RELEASE. > >=20 > > s/of this sort/of any sort/g Not quite true. We have delayed releases for security vulnerabilities before. But I digress. > For 5.1 I absolutely agree, do nothing (I don't think the poster knew > how close 5.1 is to being released.. <72hrs and counting). Let's not > let this semantic error derail the point at hand. I actually don't have an informed opinion on what BIND we should be shipping (or not shipping) in the base system. I'm hoping to learn more as the discussion progresses. I just wanted to speak up to make sure the idea of a last-minute change to 5.1-RELEASE died early. :-p Please continue... Bruce. --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+4P8G2MoxcVugUsMRAuVDAJ9B0MMyb7o04N+7+inPMFBHCZQcNgCgp5pa d6NSYRi8bP4xBAM9rBQAbyU= =VgXx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR--