From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 7 12:29:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F02D3106564A for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 12:29:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yerenkow@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B163C8FC0A for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 12:29:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iayy25 with SMTP id y25so3946296iay.13 for ; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 05:29:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=xSXDpFKAfxpJmpk2l5XcWmnufJt6yT4Kfh8/4eeI6Ys=; b=pwgYvJ8U7nDPy1jRoh50VcDbJGq5/hUD5g4qfKvzy1xJ6rRzfVDmr01biwrHG7yY7P PlQGYawZhhV5Tk2gePD59rhJ/fdIu0MaDSZgG7AcolROxDcP51jLcZej2E3JWqfNWYC5 onC7NwIMobacmvpUbvkeivvHRWJaZubFCM2kJ1H1L4j0MmUfEqGhcwzM/j5k9cx2k6ob Idm5QR/O5chM4Fo/Lq0bYrwUFlkm5Pq012NwByd2I4cU8VIyE/lim0K/Fa9Bi+sbbWd/ njqL47TM54qcPV4PaFiuQogCja6RkPtc1LGfOgYCPaGpRWOs5ZMnUwz/tbLLgA2ATzeR Kh8g== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.219.230 with SMTP id pr6mr8040187igc.29.1347020977791; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 05:29:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.28.36 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 05:29:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20120830141939.GJ64447@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <5048D2EC.70109@FreeBSD.org> <5049E060.9020602@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 15:29:37 +0300 Message-ID: From: Alexander Yerenkow To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: pkg (aka pkgng) 1.0 released X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 12:29:39 -0000 I just found out, that first call of pkg (which also known as bootstrap) became interactive, and without options. This kinda brokes a bit my automated image creation scripts (which builds images from svn). Would it be nice to have non-interactive bootstrap, maybe pkg --bootstrap or something similar. About interactivity - yes, currently it's one question, yes/no, but I think it's better to make both way now, from beginning rather than later. Thanks. -- Regards, Alexander Yerenkow