From owner-freebsd-bugs Thu Mar 18 20:10:23 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4F8415575 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 1999 20:10:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.2/8.9.2) id UAA04686; Thu, 18 Mar 1999 20:10:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 20:10:01 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199903190410.UAA04686@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Andrew Cagney Subject: Re: kern/10663: hpscan doesn't like 3.1's pt device Reply-To: Andrew Cagney Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR kern/10663; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Andrew Cagney To: cagney@tpgi.com.au, gibbs@plutotech.com Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kern/10663: hpscan doesn't like 3.1's pt device Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 15:01:35 +1100 (WET) Excerpts from mail: 18-Mar-99 Re: kern/10663: hpscan does.. @plutotech.com (609*) > > Looking at the code it would appear that the pt driver > > received a serious re-write in moving from 2.2.8 to 3.1 :-) > > > > The above error is from a failed IOCTL on the device. > My guess is that hpscan is attempting to send raw SCSI commands through the > PT device, or invoke one of the other 'pass-thru' ioctls the old pt driver > (and all drivers of the old SCSI system actually) supported. This > functionality has been moved to the pass-thru device in CAM. I would > suggest you modify hpscan to use the pass-thru device instead or cease > using whatever other unsupported ioctls it is performing. I rather like the pt driver - it's simple. These new CAM drivers scare me. I'll try to take a proper look at it. Andrew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message