From owner-freebsd-security  Wed Feb  5 10:57:59 2003
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B05037B405
	for <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed,  5 Feb 2003 10:57:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mta9.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta9.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.5.42])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1BB443F43
	for <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed,  5 Feb 2003 10:57:56 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from mspitze1@optonline.net)
Received: from asv20.srv.hcvlny.cv.net
 (asv20.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.5.174]) by mta9.srv.hcvlny.cv.net
 (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.05 (built Nov  6 2002))
 with ESMTP id <0H9U00AFRNCEXL@mta9.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for
 freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG; Wed, 05 Feb 2003 13:57:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: from bogomips (ool-18b868ca.dyn.optonline.net [24.184.104.202])
	by asv20.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (8.12.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id h15IvPX9022524	for
 <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 05 Feb 2003 13:57:26 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 14:05:32 -0500
From: Marc Spitzer <mspitze1@optonline.net>
Subject: Re: The way forward
In-reply-to: <20030205182601.GA59212@carbon.berkeley.netdot.net>
To: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Message-id: <20030205140532.4ff4390c.mspitze1@optonline.net>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.8claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.7)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
References: <20030128085617.L167@woody.ops.uunet.co.za>
 <3E415602.30669.FF9FC2@localhost>
 <20030205182601.GA59212@carbon.berkeley.netdot.net>
Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-security.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-security>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-security>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

On Wed, 05 Feb 2003 10:26:01 -0800
Nicholas Esborn <nick@netdot.net> wrote:

> Here here on pf envy.  It's not well tested yet, but pf's architecture
> and capabilities look better than both ipf and ipfw.
> 
> -nick
> 

Could you share some details on that?

marc

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message