From owner-freebsd-smp Fri Mar 24 18:32:12 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Received: from news-ma.rhein-neckar.de (news-ma.rhein-neckar.de [193.197.90.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6F0E37B5EF for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 18:32:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from naddy@bigeye.rhein-neckar.de) Received: from bigeye.rhein-neckar.de (uucp@localhost) by news-ma.rhein-neckar.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with bsmtp id DAA22252 for freebsd-smp@freebsd.org; Sat, 25 Mar 2000 03:32:02 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from naddy@bigeye.rhein-neckar.de) Received: (from naddy@localhost) by bigeye.rhein-neckar.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id BAA49734 for freebsd-smp@freebsd.org; Sat, 25 Mar 2000 01:52:18 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from naddy) Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2000 01:52:18 +0100 From: Christian Weisgerber To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: PR #17479: parallel building of ports Message-ID: <20000325015218.A43375@bigeye.rhein-neckar.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I received absolutely *no* reaction in response to PR ports/17479 which suggests a minimal change to allow reliable parallel building (i.e. make -jX) of ports. I can't imagine that I'm the only person with an SMP box who cares about this. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.rhein-neckar.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message