From owner-freebsd-current Fri Jul 23 14:13:53 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from axl.noc.iafrica.com (axl.noc.iafrica.com [196.31.1.175]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13ABB14E53 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 14:13:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sheldonh@axl.noc.iafrica.com) Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.noc.iafrica.com) by axl.noc.iafrica.com with local-esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 117mdc-000Cvp-00; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 23:13:52 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: "John W. DeBoskey" Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: inetd looping (from cvs-all) In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 23 Jul 1999 14:33:43 -0400." <199907231833.OAA52589@bb01f39.unx.sas.com> Date: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 23:13:52 +0200 Message-ID: <49712.932764432@axl.noc.iafrica.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 23 Jul 1999 14:33:43 -0400, "John W. DeBoskey" wrote: > PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU CPU COMMAND > 198 root 105 0 908K 584K RUN 141.8H 95.70% 95.70% inetd [...] > There are NO messages in /var/log/messages. > > The -l option doesn't seem to work, and the -d option seems > to cause inetd to lock up. I can't comment on the -d option locking up, other than that it may have conspired with a bug to produce a far too busy inetd. :-) I introduced a bug in inetd.c rev 1.57, where code intended to serve dgram services was used for servicing stream services as well. I believe that DES fixed this problem a few hours ago. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message