Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2015 16:21:50 +0200 From: TooMeeK Admin <maps@toomeek.waw.pl> To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dwc on banana pi pro and poor network performance Message-ID: <560FE47E.50703@toomeek.waw.pl> In-Reply-To: <F69250DB-0096-41D4-85C1-244122357C45@netgate.com> References: <560ED8DF.4080709@gmx.de> <560F2706.9@toomeek.waw.pl> <F69250DB-0096-41D4-85C1-244122357C45@netgate.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Well, did I missed something? Both BPi and BP PRO have same chip. Here's real test from workstation - BPi test: iperf-2.0.5-2-win32>iperf -c 192.168.137.222 -P 10 ------------------------------------------------------------ Client connecting to 192.168.137.222, TCP port 5001 TCP window size: 64.0 KByte (default) ------------------------------------------------------------ [ 12] local 192.168.137.1 port 55957 connected with 192.168.137.222 port 5001 [ 9] local 192.168.137.1 port 55954 connected with 192.168.137.222 port 5001 [ 11] local 192.168.137.1 port 55956 connected with 192.168.137.222 port 5001 [ 8] local 192.168.137.1 port 55953 connected with 192.168.137.222 port 5001 [ 10] local 192.168.137.1 port 55955 connected with 192.168.137.222 port 5001 [ 4] local 192.168.137.1 port 55949 connected with 192.168.137.222 port 5001 [ 7] local 192.168.137.1 port 55952 connected with 192.168.137.222 port 5001 [ 6] local 192.168.137.1 port 55951 connected with 192.168.137.222 port 5001 [ 5] local 192.168.137.1 port 55950 connected with 192.168.137.222 port 5001 [ 3] local 192.168.137.1 port 55948 connected with 192.168.137.222 port 5001 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 9] 0.0-10.0 sec 94.2 MBytes 79.0 Mbits/sec [ 11] 0.0-10.0 sec 103 MBytes 86.3 Mbits/sec [ 8] 0.0-10.0 sec 115 MBytes 96.6 Mbits/sec [ 4] 0.0-10.0 sec 111 MBytes 93.0 Mbits/sec [ 6] 0.0-10.0 sec 122 MBytes 102 Mbits/sec [ 5] 0.0-10.0 sec 106 MBytes 89.1 Mbits/sec [ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 113 MBytes 94.6 Mbits/sec [ 12] 0.0-10.0 sec 119 MBytes 99.3 Mbits/sec [ 10] 0.0-10.0 sec 97.0 MBytes 81.1 Mbits/sec [ 7] 0.0-10.0 sec 126 MBytes 105 Mbits/sec [SUM] 0.0-10.0 sec 1.08 GBytes 925 Mbits/sec I assume it's accurate if You're right, huh? The problem here is how to achieve same speeds under FreeBSD. W dniu 2015-10-03 o 06:30, Jim Thompson pisze: > Not even. 600Mbits tops, and that's on a good day, downhill, and with > the wind.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?560FE47E.50703>