From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Nov  9 23:12:56 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8DB416A4CE
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sun,  9 Nov 2003 23:12:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hobbiton.shire.net (hobbiton.shire.net [206.71.64.250])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E919843FE9
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sun,  9 Nov 2003 23:12:55 -0800 (PST)	(envelope-from chad@shire.net)
Received: from [67.161.247.57] (helo=[192.168.99.66])
	by hobbiton.shire.net with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.10)
	id 1AJ6EI-0008kO-00; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 00:12:54 -0700
In-Reply-To: <20031110075152.5b06fe12.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org>
References: <61B97A72-128F-11D8-9FD6-003065A70D30@shire.net>
	<20031109112856.GB94834@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<6BE82884-1328-11D8-9FD6-003065A70D30@shire.net>
	<20031109210901.Y31688@seekingfire.com>
	<F43836EC-1330-11D8-9FD6-003065A70D30@shire.net>
	<20031109222121.A31688@seekingfire.com>
	<32F637C6-133A-11D8-9FD6-003065A70D30@shire.net>
	<4C364FED-133F-11D8-9FD6-003065A70D30@shire.net>
	<20031110075152.5b06fe12.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v606)
Message-Id: <4CB5E2BF-134D-11D8-9FD6-003065A70D30@shire.net>
From: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" <chad@shire.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 00:12:52 -0700
To: Miguel Mendez <flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.606)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.4
	tests=BAYES_01,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
	      REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_APPLEMAIL
	version=2.55
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)
cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: NFS v2? possible?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 07:12:57 -0000


On Nov 9, 2003, at 11:51 PM, Miguel Mendez wrote:

> On Sun, 9 Nov 2003 22:32:38 -0700
> "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" <chad@shire.net> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> It seems to be ok.  I don't know what the problem is, but it seems to
>> be on the Linux end as I run mountd and portmap with verbose
>> debugging, as appropriate to each, and mountd immediately returns a
>> "mount successful" but Liunx take 10 minutes to return from the mount
>> command.
>
> You probably want to use the 'nolock' option in Linux, that solved it
> from me.
>

Thanks, I'll check.  I did solve the problem though.  The "runlevel" 
was set to be one less than full multi user mode which supposedly 
excluded nfs and I found a log file complaining about the client 
portmap daemon so I fixed that...  Just got to get a new kernel to 
support v3 and do some tuning and we should be ok.

thanks
Chad


> Cheers,
> -- 
> 	Miguel Mendez <flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org>
> 	http://www.energyhq.es.eu.org