Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 20:55:44 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Evaluating the performance of a single FreeBSD server Message-ID: <gst202$shv$1@ger.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <e321688c0904231104g209086e8u5bda23c88676332e@mail.gmail.com> References: <e321688c0904231104g209086e8u5bda23c88676332e@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] Michel Di Croci wrote: > colocation environment) and use it as a starting server and runs an Apache + > PHP + PostgreSQL (for a long run stable and expandable DB). If it starts to Even if we forget everything else you said, "Apache + PHP + PostgreSQL" means you have at least ... BOTE calculation ... at least 24 different combinations of how these components interact with each other and each has different performance characteristics. You need to give us much more information before something meaningful can be concluded. In general, 90% of your performance issues will be in the application (PHP code, not PHP itself) and the database (structure, indexes, etc.). Assuming you have a decent application architecture, database schema and enough bandwidth, can you think of a similar already existing web application so people can have a baseline when giving you advice? (Don't think "Google" ... think of a smaller application which can be compared in size to yours). [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAknyCzAACgkQldnAQVacBchesACeIFbACZiiP4cbvpEZ0fEayBC3 JYUAniXV1Gh5YEgMgffIYd7ihg3bcb4W =HRUp -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?gst202$shv$1>