From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 18 17:23:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4CB51065673 for ; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 17:23:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de) Received: from smtp.kn-bremen.de (gelbbaer.kn-bremen.de [78.46.108.116]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F54F8FC20 for ; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 17:23:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de) Received: by smtp.kn-bremen.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id 7371F1E002B2; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 19:23:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from triton.kn-bremen.de (noident@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by triton.kn-bremen.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n6IHMR8x065371; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 19:22:27 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from nox@triton.kn-bremen.de) Received: (from nox@localhost) by triton.kn-bremen.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n6IHMRNF065370; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 19:22:27 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from nox) Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 19:22:27 +0200 (CEST) From: Juergen Lock Message-Id: <200907181722.n6IHMRNF065370@triton.kn-bremen.de> To: tingox@gmail.com X-Newsgroups: local.list.freebsd.ports In-Reply-To: References: <20090704112402.GA87051@triton.kn-bremen.de> <20090704120713.GA17665@triton.kn-bremen.de> <20090706164652.GA38440@triton.kn-bremen.de> <20090707214134.GA66882@triton.kn-bremen.de> <20090709184446.GA20846@hades.panopticon> <20090710220705.GA43250@triton.kn-bremen.de> <20090711183138.GC77483@triton.kn-bremen.de> <20090711185222.GA85370@triton.kn-bremen.de> Organization: home Cc: FreeBSD Ports ML Subject: Re: call for testing: print/hplip update, pass 2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 17:23:34 -0000 In article you write: >On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: >> Does HPLIP (on FreeBSD) still require that the printer attaches as a >> ugen device? > >Answer to self - yes this is still required. It is at least with the old usb stack i.e. on 7.x and earlier, since the old stack doesn't support doing direct ugen-like io on non-ugen devices which hplip needs. The new stack does however as I was just told, so chances are this will work on head. (well, unless there is still code missing in hplip, testing this here is difficult as I said.) HTH, Juergen