Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 14:25:52 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: Mitchell Horne <mhorne@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Poudriere friendly armv7 relases Message-ID: <CANCZdfqk9Em3ydSQ_4Q6Kfdzo7R5LpGuTKzyj9VOmcPspTROhA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <98a658ac-fadc-0ac3-4c31-ecbf22f5ba12@freebsd.org> References: <CANCZdfo7A6%2BzB%2B=Wx5Y9VYFCsSk=Aa%2B9657FxfG0whM-Wsx1kQ@mail.gmail.com> <98a658ac-fadc-0ac3-4c31-ecbf22f5ba12@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--00000000000062db6205f75abc50 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 2:23=E2=80=AFPM Mitchell Horne <mhorne@freebsd.org>= wrote: > > > On 3/20/23 17:06, Warner Losh wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > Since it looks like we're going to retain at least armv7 for FreeBSD 14 > > (armv6 has been nominated for deprecation, but if it isn't deprecated, > > all this applies to it). > > > > I'd like to start making at least the base.tgz, etc available for armv7= . > > This would allow us to create armv7 poduriere jails without building > > from source. > > > > Is there some reason we're not doing this today? I know ISOs don't make > > a lot of sense in the arm ecosystem, but having these artifacts would > > enable poudriere binary install support. > > > > Comments? > > > > I more-or-less proposed this in https://reviews.freebsd.org/D29923. See > the discussion that follows. Basically this is in re@'s hands and you > should make some noise in their direction. > Ah, that's why I thought it was tied to .iso creation :). Maybe the right thing is to just do it for 14 and let the fallout happen and be worked through :) Warner --00000000000062db6205f75abc50 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr"><br></div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">= <div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 2:23=E2=80=AF= PM Mitchell Horne <<a href=3D"mailto:mhorne@freebsd.org">mhorne@freebsd.= org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"marg= in:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1e= x"><br> <br> On 3/20/23 17:06, Warner Losh wrote:<br> > Greetings,<br> > <br> > Since it looks like we're going to retain at least armv7 for FreeB= SD 14 <br> > (armv6 has been nominated for deprecation, but if it isn't depreca= ted, <br> > all this applies to it).<br> > <br> > I'd like to start making at least the base.tgz, etc available for = armv7. <br> > This would allow us to create armv7 poduriere jails without building <= br> > from source.<br> > <br> > Is there some reason we're not doing this today? I know ISOs don&#= 39;t make <br> > a lot of sense in the arm ecosystem, but having these artifacts would = <br> > enable poudriere binary install support.<br> > <br> > Comments?<br> > <br> <br> I more-or-less proposed this in <a href=3D"https://reviews.freebsd.org/D299= 23" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://reviews.freebsd.org/D29923= </a>. See <br> the discussion that follows. Basically this is in re@'s hands and you <= br> should make some noise in their direction.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><= div>Ah, that's why I thought it was tied to .iso creation :). Maybe the= right thing is to just do it for 14 and let the fallout happen and be work= ed through :)</div><div><br></div><div>Warner=C2=A0</div></div></div> --00000000000062db6205f75abc50--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CANCZdfqk9Em3ydSQ_4Q6Kfdzo7R5LpGuTKzyj9VOmcPspTROhA>