From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 05:43:05 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F59316A4B3; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 05:43:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from imf16aec.mail.bellsouth.net (imf16aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.64]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B982943F93; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 05:43:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from drhodus@catpa.com) Received: from catpa.com ([67.32.176.213]) by imf16aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.05.27 201-253-122-126-127-20021220) with ESMTP id <20030916124303.OAGK21511.imf16aec.mail.bellsouth.net@catpa.com>; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 08:43:03 -0400 Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 08:43:00 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552) To: re@freebsd.org From: David Rhodus In-Reply-To: <20030916200513.R4917@gamplex.bde.org> Message-Id: <4E7675BC-E843-11D7-979C-000A959B213E@catpa.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.552) cc: Maxim Konovalov cc: Scott Long cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Release Engineering Status Report X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 12:43:05 -0000 On Tuesday, September 16, 2003, at 06:11 AM, Bruce Evans wrote: > On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Maxim Konovalov wrote: > >> PAE MFC brought an incredible instability to stable branch. It >> affects 100% of our user community especially when we issued several >> SAs since PAE commit. They often can't switch to RELENG_4_x security >> branches because even RELENG_4_8 misses several critical non-security >> fixes. > Right, say if still the OpenSSH did or still comes out to be real. Ops, now thats right, we don't have 3.6.1 in STABLE, why ? It was released on April 1, does that not give one enough time to merge this in ? Perhaps someone new is needed then to manage the import of OpenSSH if that is the case, if it is re@ or other decision member's of FreeBSD wouldn't allow it, then perhaps its time to restructure that part.... I'm not sure what the case is as other parts of been MFC'd lately without very much testing if any, noting the panic's that have been accruing on users running stable for the past 8 months. Should that just be taken as a sign of EoL for RELENG_4 ? > I merged PAE into my version of -current a bit at a time and didn't > notice any problems (with PAE not actually configured) despite having > some large logical inconsistencies from not having all of it. Most > of the global changes had no effect since they just changed the names > of some typedefs without changing the underlying types in the !PAE > case. So I suspect that any instabilities in RELENG_4 in the !PAE > case are indirectly related to PAE and/or localized and thus easy to > find and fix. Right the fix(es) should be trivial though incredibly hard to track down. Even more so that FreeBSD no long has anyone that is qualified to do any real work on the VM system. It is ridicules that re@ has allowed PAE to stay in the STABLE branch for still long with the amount of instability that it has created. I know its just uncovering bugs in the system that have always been present. Now we have many many kernel stack trace's and should be able to track it down over the next week months. For now though, the PAE commit should be removed from the RELENG_4 tree. Anything else should be not excepted by the FreeBSD community. -DR