From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 3 23:22:26 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54A0F1065672; Tue, 3 Jun 2008 23:22:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Received: from sakura.ninth-nine.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:2f0:104:80a0:230:48ff:fe41:2455]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2CFC8FC18; Tue, 3 Jun 2008 23:22:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Received: from nadesico.ninth-nine.com (nadesico.ninth-nine.com [219.127.74.122]) by sakura.ninth-nine.com (8.14.1/8.14.1/NinthNine) with SMTP id m53NMNjc013021; Wed, 4 Jun 2008 08:22:24 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 08:22:23 +0900 From: Norikatsu Shigemura To: pyunyh@gmail.com Message-Id: <20080604082223.ad351c12.nork@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20080603084404.GB87699@cdnetworks.co.kr> References: <20080602034630.eb07fe5c.nork@FreeBSD.org> <20080602003948.GA83841@cdnetworks.co.kr> <20080603011316.7736c782.nork@FreeBSD.org> <20080603010001.GA87699@cdnetworks.co.kr> <20080603134425.e78589b5.nork@FreeBSD.org> <20080603084404.GB87699@cdnetworks.co.kr> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.5.0beta3 (GTK+ 2.12.9; i386-portbld-freebsd8.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (sakura.ninth-nine.com [219.127.74.121]); Wed, 04 Jun 2008 08:22:24 +0900 (JST) Cc: Bill Paul , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, Sam Leffler Subject: Re: axe(4) doesn't work (patch to replace obsolete if_watchdog interface) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2008 23:22:26 -0000 On Tue, 3 Jun 2008 17:44:04 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > > ukphy0: IDR1 = 0x7949, IDR2 = 0x7949 > Hmm, this also looks like faked one. Probably PHY address was > incorrectly chosen. I guess the PHY would be one of Marvell > variants. If this is correct guess, I think ax88178_init() should > be called prior to any other operations(patch attached). > Sam, what's your opinion? Humm... No different. I'll try to research points of different from Linux's code.