Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 08:22:23 +0900 From: Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org> To: pyunyh@gmail.com Cc: Bill Paul <wpaul@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, Sam Leffler <sam@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: axe(4) doesn't work (patch to replace obsolete if_watchdog interface) Message-ID: <20080604082223.ad351c12.nork@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20080603084404.GB87699@cdnetworks.co.kr> References: <20080602034630.eb07fe5c.nork@FreeBSD.org> <20080602003948.GA83841@cdnetworks.co.kr> <20080603011316.7736c782.nork@FreeBSD.org> <20080603010001.GA87699@cdnetworks.co.kr> <20080603134425.e78589b5.nork@FreeBSD.org> <20080603084404.GB87699@cdnetworks.co.kr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 3 Jun 2008 17:44:04 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon <pyunyh@gmail.com> wrote: > > ukphy0: IDR1 = 0x7949, IDR2 = 0x7949 > Hmm, this also looks like faked one. Probably PHY address was > incorrectly chosen. I guess the PHY would be one of Marvell > variants. If this is correct guess, I think ax88178_init() should > be called prior to any other operations(patch attached). > Sam, what's your opinion? Humm... No different. I'll try to research points of different from Linux's code.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080604082223.ad351c12.nork>