From owner-freebsd-doc Tue Mar 31 06:00:48 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA16231 for freebsd-doc-outgoing; Tue, 31 Mar 1998 06:00:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from cons.org (knight.cons.org [194.233.237.86]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA16226 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 1998 06:00:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cracauer@cons.org) Received: (from cracauer@localhost) by cons.org (8.8.5/8.7.3) id QAA16284; Tue, 31 Mar 1998 16:00:33 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <19980331160032.46158@cons.org> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 1998 16:00:32 +0200 From: Martin Cracauer To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: "hackers" and "crackers" in FreeBSD handbook Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.81 Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The FreeBSD handbook sometimes uses the term "hacker" for those evil-minded security-breaking people we usually like to name "crackers" (i.e. "evil.hackers.org"). I would like to change that to the correct term, anyone against it? Martin -- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Martin Cracauer http://www.cons.org/cracauer cracauer@wavehh.hanse.de (batched, preferred for large mails) Tel.: (daytime) +4940 41478712 Fax.: (daytime) +4940 41478715 Tel.: (private) +4940 5221829 Fax.: (private) +4940 5228536 Paper: (private) Waldstrasse 200, 22846 Norderstedt, Germany To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message