From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 5 23:48:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4299516A416; Fri, 5 Jan 2007 23:48:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jroberson@chesapeake.net) Received: from webaccess-cl.virtdom.com (webaccess-cl.virtdom.com [216.240.101.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FFE713C467; Fri, 5 Jan 2007 23:48:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jroberson@chesapeake.net) Received: from [10.0.0.1] (216-160-98-154.tukw.qwest.net [216.160.98.154]) (authenticated bits=0) by webaccess-cl.virtdom.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l05NlwVg054496 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 5 Jan 2007 18:48:08 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jroberson@chesapeake.net) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 15:46:35 -0800 (PST) From: Jeff Roberson X-X-Sender: jroberson@10.0.0.1 To: David Xu In-Reply-To: <459DB871.1050109@freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20070105154450.Y586@10.0.0.1> References: <20070104005625.D1508@10.0.0.1> <459CCBA1.40305@freebsd.org> <200701050749.49058.davidxu@freebsd.org> <20070104155755.Y552@10.0.0.1> <20070104163449.D552@10.0.0.1> <459DB871.1050109@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Kip Macy , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ULE 2.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 23:48:15 -0000 On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, David Xu wrote: > >> Anyway, thanks for the pointer Xu. I may hack this up and compare it to >> ULE's current balancing. > > Yesterday, I have tested super-smack benchmark on 2-cpu machine, ULE > decreased performance about 40%, this might be a regression though. I just fixed a regression in the load balancer. On my 8way opteron ULE is now 22% faster than 4BSD for select-key.smack with 32 threads. This is for both KSE and libthr. libthr is of course significantly faster overall. I believe I can improve this even more by borrowing some tricks from solaris. Jeff > >> >> Cheers, >> Jeff >> > > Regards, > David Xu > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >