From owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 16:02:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91C1216A4CE; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:02:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from gw.catspoiler.org (217-ip-163.nccn.net [209.79.217.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C85EF43D49; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:02:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Received: from FreeBSD.org (mousie.catspoiler.org [192.168.101.2]) by gw.catspoiler.org (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0C02F7E031685; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:02:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <200401120002.i0C02F7E031685@gw.catspoiler.org> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:02:15 -0800 (PST) From: Don Lewis To: imp@bsdimp.com In-Reply-To: <20040111.155500.121671029.imp@bsdimp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: nork@FreeBSD.org cc: mobile@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: More power patches X-BeenThere: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Mobile computing with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 00:02:33 -0000 On 11 Jan, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <20040110.140024.12639654.imp@bsdimp.com> > "M. Warner Losh" writes: > : In message: <20040110093526.13ec4aa5.nork@FreeBSD.org> > : Norikatsu Shigemura writes: > : : cbb1: Lazy allocation of 0x1000 bytes rid 0x10 type 3 at 0xe0203d00 > : ^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^ > : This is the problem. Notice the alignment of the resource allocated. > : This is bogus. > > I think I have a fix for this, and hope to get an updated patch out... That doesn't appear to be the cause of the breakage I'm seeing ... > fwohci0: <1394 Open Host Controller Interface> mem 0xc0204000-0xc0207fff,0xc0209000-0xc02097ff irq 11 at device 7.0 on pci2 > fwohci0: Bus reserved 0x800 bytes for rid 0x10 type 3 at 0xc0209000 Hmn, maybe that is the problem. I just took a closer look and earlier in the boot I see: > cbb0: Lazy allocation of 0x1000 bytes rid 0x10 type 3 at 0xc0209800 I bet cbb0 thinks that it is at 0xc0209000, which might interfere with fwohci0. There is still the issue of the irq breakage caused by the attach failure.