From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Aug 21 22:05:11 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28C5AC9F;
 Wed, 21 Aug 2013 22:05:11 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from sfourman@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-ve0-x232.google.com (mail-ve0-x232.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c01::232])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3A282FE4;
 Wed, 21 Aug 2013 22:05:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ve0-f178.google.com with SMTP id ox1so916035veb.9
 for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 15:05:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=kgRzr7ZvejxZLZCkZQ5Jp215A/jLpdP3B8ACl3wX3E0=;
 b=T02y7BX7HvN9V392bnXE2hVyjB2ApiKDDfl00vIyAtH2tJhDoeaNKIwu3/UwePjYbb
 Sja6gUpReUiWWOrZVbc50bSob1Vs1YZGwTbs6WYIKb/G8V2Q9p9LaOhjUiB9NKwpravQ
 5pz0A82B8TuoIa6mvsmMYhIwFeXwrrdEo5ZYl7WVglyXSvbiWwym5VtMu/yYfb10FMsA
 uqQGOwv7Yr0swSeXLwdpi6c5d9vbTHAokv7kLYnmziQb5r/aA4zc8eu211Cw9r+dgvWQ
 tawKMEEOHwYUl6j8ycbUIO/a9gNWFRk0+R4DX5Yr/1gCNM/XOu4DQxNVJbgOetLY60SA
 Cxkw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.220.76.10 with SMTP id a10mr234156vck.31.1377122709844; Wed,
 21 Aug 2013 15:05:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.96.78 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 15:05:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CADBaqmi4gEG_yAfibKPY2=GgJoqqZOVbos77iSFh0gKt990q6g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADBaqmi6c7v8ojry8uViRi9tK18n8_RaDrP+UjvcmEN9guWm3w@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130822.032022.481255110184207810.hrs@allbsd.org>
 <CADBaqmi4gEG_yAfibKPY2=GgJoqqZOVbos77iSFh0gKt990q6g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 18:05:09 -0400
Message-ID: <CAOFF+Z0Sm=Ewb_Qn9gzu=rdpadSf+mAv-RfZ6chSj5-6ca0WaQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: CFR: FIB handling improvements
From: "Sam Fourman Jr." <sfourman@gmail.com>
To: Will Andrews <will@firepipe.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Cc: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@freebsd.org>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org,
 Hiroki Sato <hrs@freebsd.org>, Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 22:05:11 -0000

On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Will Andrews <will@firepipe.net> wrote:

>
> Other places in rc.d/routing can make use of 'all' in that case.
>
> No, loopback host routes are not installed into all FIBs, only FIB 0.
> This is with rt_add_addr_allfibs == 0 (see rtinit1()), which probably
> explains why.  We could add an override for lo0 addresses, but perhaps
> this is something that should be configurable?  i.e. allow the
> administrator to specify in rc.conf which FIBs lo0's host route should
> be placed on?
>
> Will, you have my wheels turning, configurable tuning for lo0's host
route.
This would defiantly be a interesting feature.
-- 

Sam Fourman Jr.