From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Feb 19 22:39:26 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id WAA24790 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 19 Feb 1996 22:39:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id WAA24785 for ; Mon, 19 Feb 1996 22:39:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id WAA23031; Mon, 19 Feb 1996 22:37:21 -0800 To: Tom Samplonius cc: Rich Siggs , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Q: exportable DES library & "DES How To" for 2.1-STABLE In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 19 Feb 1996 22:36:11 PST." Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 22:37:21 -0800 Message-ID: <23028.824798241@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > But 1.1 didn't use MD5 and you only got DES if you specifically > installed it. 2.1 can use MD5 or DES. Stock 1.1 used something different. Uh.. Perhaps there's some confusion (on my part, most likely). I thought he was talking about the *dual* encryption feature whereby MD5 and DES keys would be recognised and proplerly decrypted even if they were mixed together in the same password file. That didn't come until post-2.1. Yes, it's perfectly possible to make the choice between one or the other and just run one - that's worked for awhile now. Jordan