Date: Sun, 9 May 1999 17:59:12 -0700 (PDT) From: wpaul@FreeBSD.ORG (Bill Paul) To: peter@netplex.com.au (Peter Wemm) Cc: phk@FreeBSD.ORG (Poul-Henning Kamp), cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, jb@cimlogic.com.au Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf options src/sys/i386/i386 autoconf.c src/sys/i386/conf GENERIC LINT Makefile.i386 files.i386 Message-ID: <19990510005912.F423714DF1@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <19990509222214.B069E1F73@spinner.netplex.com.au> from Peter Wemm at "May 10, 1999 6:22:12 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > >Does this change mean that it is no longer possible to choose the name > > > >of the "kernel"? I was using this "feature" for embedded kernels that > > > >get loaded into flash on boards. These embedded kernels aren't general, > > > >so I thought they deserved to have board-specific names. > > > > > > Uhm, sorry, didn't think anybody used that feature (considering how > > > many places "kernel" was already hardcoded). > > > > Well now you know. Please put it back (not all of it, just the ability > > to say "config foo" to specify the name of the kernel image). > > Umm, would this do? > > makeoptions KERNEL=foo No. -Bill To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990510005912.F423714DF1>