From owner-freebsd-fortran@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 6 09:09:51 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: fortran@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE0A6161 for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 09:09:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmailer.gwdg.de (fmailer.gwdg.de [134.76.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DD3D9EF for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 09:09:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from um-excht-a02.um.gwdg.de ([134.76.11.222] helo=email.gwdg.de) by mailer.gwdg.de with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xb4IZ-0007Ps-JK; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 11:09:43 +0200 Received: from lt047.nfv (87.187.105.231) by email.gwdg.de (134.76.9.211) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 11:09:43 +0200 Message-ID: <54325C52.10402@gwdg.de> Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 11:09:38 +0200 From: Rainer Hurling User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: , Subject: Re: kill this list? References: <201410060832.s968WCLm095448@mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <201410060832.s968WCLm095448@mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Level: - X-Virus-Scanned: (clean) by clamav X-BeenThere: freebsd-fortran@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Fortran on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 09:09:52 -0000 Am 06.10.2014 um 10:32 schrieb Anton Shterenlikht: > I think it's just Steve and me here. > Given that the volume on the list is approaching zero, > I must admit I overestimated the demand > for fortran on FreeBSD. Anyway, it seems > freebsd-toolchain@ or freebsd-performance@ > are adequate enough to discuss fortran related > FreeBSD issues. > > As I was the person who proposed the creation > of this list, I now propose to remove it. > > If nobody complains here, I'll then contact > the postmaster with the request to remove the list. > > Anton I am only a 'reader' on this list. But many of the fortran problems remain until now. Often, only because of that, we have to use gcc instead of clang (something similar to openmp). And this brings new problems with dependencies, compiled under clang and so on ... Thanks for the work on this list until now, Rainer Hurling