Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 22:32:26 +0100 From: Ben Laurie <ben@algroup.co.uk> To: Dirk Froemberg <dirk@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: "Matthew N. Dodd" <winter@jurai.net>, Adam Laurie <adam@algroup.co.uk>, "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG>, greg@greg.rim.or.jp, sumikawa@FreeBSD.ORG, hetzels@westbend.net, ache@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG, asami@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: apache13-php4 Message-ID: <38FB82EA.5E13F935@algroup.co.uk> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004112012280.50194-100000@sasami.jurai.net> <38F44FB1.B50AE334@algroup.co.uk> <20000412142920.A5417@physik.TU-Berlin.DE> <38F46E6B.2AC09839@algroup.co.uk> <20000416234835.A9268@physik.TU-Berlin.DE>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dirk Froemberg wrote: > > Hi Ben! > > Sorry for being late with my answer. I'm just too busy these days. > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2000 at 01:39:07PM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote: > > Dirk Froemberg wrote: > > [...] > > > So it would be possible to create a "mod_apache-ssl" (the name is just > > > an example) that is configured via apxs similar to the other mod_* > > > ports, i. e. depend on apache13? Would it conflict with mod_ssl or > > > could "mod_apache-ssl" and mod_ssl be installed both? > > > > I'm not familiar with apxs, I'm afraid (die-hard old-school Apache > > programmer, me) - can you give me an example of what you mean by this? > > i.e. how would I test that it works? > > man apxs ;-) ben@scuzzy:~/work/suppose-aldigital-tools/bandwidth$ man apxs No manual entry for apxs > It's not important if it is build via apxs or not. I mentioned apxs > only because it's the standard way of building apache modules. Err. Not where I come from. > The main point of my question was if it is possible to create a > apache-ssl module without recompiling apache. Only once Apache has been patched. As is the case for mod_ssl. > > Since both Apache-SSL and mod_ssl have to patch Apache, I don't see how > > they can possibly not conflict, I'm afraid. > > So it isn't possible to add hooks (patches) to apache13 for both > mod_ssl and "mod_apache-ssl"? Anything is possible, naturally. However, this is not the way it is. I'm not sure how likely it is ever to be that way in 1.3, since 1.3 is now frozen, and I doubt that mod_ssl and Apache-SSL will converge sufficiently to make it happen from the outside. As I think I mentioned before this is all a non-problem in 2.0. But 2.0 is not ready for production use, of course. Cheers, Ben. -- http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?38FB82EA.5E13F935>