From owner-freebsd-current Thu Dec 4 22:30:36 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id WAA21673 for current-outgoing; Thu, 4 Dec 1997 22:30:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current) Received: from luke.cpl.net (luke.cpl.net [207.67.172.194]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA21662 for ; Thu, 4 Dec 1997 22:30:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from shawn@luke.cpl.net) Received: from localhost (shawn@localhost) by luke.cpl.net (8.8.8/8.6.12) with SMTP id WAA24555 for ; Thu, 4 Dec 1997 22:33:59 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 1997 22:33:58 -0800 (PST) From: Shawn Ramsey cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 3.0 -release ? In-Reply-To: <24128.881301169@time.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > I think we can decipher through all this that Amancio has an axe to > grind about release schedules and a lack of firmness in same. That's > fine. I don't think that anyone here disputes our general inability > to hit a fixed release date if we're not allowed to sneak up real > close to it first. We *suck* at this, in many ways, and we're going > to continue to suck right up until such time as the whole release Everyone sucks at release schedules. Release dates often slip by months. Remember Windows 4.0, AKA Chicago, Windows 93 or was it 94?