From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 24 03:57:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B3D316A4CE for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 03:57:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hotmail.com (bay102-f34.bay102.hotmail.com [64.4.61.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47F2543D3F for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 03:57:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from woodycarey@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 19:57:01 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 67.112.113.90 by by102fd.bay102.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 03:55:59 GMT X-Originating-IP: [67.112.113.90] X-Originating-Email: [woodycarey@hotmail.com] X-Sender: woodycarey@hotmail.com From: "W C" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 19:55:59 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Feb 2005 03:57:01.0438 (UTC) FILETIME=[E51439E0:01C51A24] Subject: cvs tag for -STABLE for ports-supfile ? use HEAD or ??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 03:57:03 -0000 I just (successfully) upgraded my remote 5.2.1 box to 5.3-STABLE Feb 22 05 with the usual buildworld buildkernel installkernel mergemaster reboot installworld mergemaster reboot etc. I want to upgrade my ports tree to that which is correct for -STABLE. Is there a ports-STABLE cvs tag I can use, or is it safe to just use HEAD, as is in the stock supfile? Thanks, woody _________________________________________________________________ Don’t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/