From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Sep 8 19:08:21 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id TAA24536 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 8 Sep 1997 19:08:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from adam.ist.flinders.edu.au (root@adam.ist.flinders.edu.au [129.96.1.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA24526 for ; Mon, 8 Sep 1997 19:08:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lofty.ist.flinders.edu.au (root@lofty.ist.flinders.edu.au [129.96.43.66]) by adam.ist.flinders.edu.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA12658 for ; Tue, 9 Sep 1997 11:38:25 +0930 (CST) Received: from lofty.ist.flinders.edu.au (doconnor@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lofty.ist.flinders.edu.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA06585 for ; Tue, 9 Sep 1997 11:38:08 +0930 (CST) Message-Id: <199709090208.LAA06585@lofty.ist.flinders.edu.au> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Divert sockets.. In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 08 Sep 1997 08:19:13 +0100." <19970908081913.36000@pavilion.net> Date: Tue, 09 Sep 1997 11:38:05 +0930 From: "Daniel J. O'Connor" Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > That's not entirely true. Is it? The 4000 had memory protection and the > same O/S. (a500 ran 68000, a4000 ran 68030/40). Nope, it had non memory protection either.. You could get VM packages if you had an MMU, but memory protection would have be _really_ hard to do :) Seeya Darius ~~~~~~