From owner-freebsd-current Thu Apr 29 14:26: 3 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from ewok.creative.net.au (ewok.creative.net.au [203.30.44.41]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0522114C09 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 1999 14:25:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from adrian@freebsd.org) Received: (qmail 12575 invoked by uid 1008); 29 Apr 1999 21:25:55 -0000 Message-ID: <19990429212555.12573.qmail@ewok.creative.net.au> From: adrian@freebsd.org To: Mike Tancsa Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Any action on PR 10570 ? getting closer to 65K :-( In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 29 Apr 1999 16:44:27 -0400." <3.0.5.32.19990429164427.00b69730@staff.sentex.ca> Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 05:25:55 +0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Mike Tancsa writes: > >I am currently using a couple of FreeBSD boxes for my border routers, and >it seems that the global routing table is getting closer and closer to 65K+ >routes (i.e. sooner than later I am going to bump into PR 10570). I am not >a systems programmer by any stretch of the imagination, so I would not know >how to go about debugging anything and everything that would be effected by >changing the size from a short to a long. I guess this PR only effects >very few people, so I can understand it not being a priority. But are >there any plans to look at it soon ? > >wat-border# netstat -nr | wc > 59118 355941 4200959 > > Hey, that is an interesting pr. I'd like to tackle this one if noone minds, I have a similar environment to debug this one in, but it might take a little time. Adrian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message