Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 09:48:13 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> To: Andrew <infofarmer@mail.ru> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kernel-level PPPoE server Message-ID: <20040712084813.GB92187@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <000e01c467b3$b07bd950$0111a8c0@SATPC> References: <000e01c467b3$b07bd950$0111a8c0@SATPC>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--NMuMz9nt05w80d4+
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 05:58:12AM +0400, Andrew wrote:
> I run FreeBSD4.10-Release and I want to set up a kernel-level PPPoE serve=
r.
> The problem is I can't find a way to make pppd work with pppoed. As you
> know, pppoed executes "exec /usr/sbin/ppp -direct label" by default, but =
it
> can be passed any other line to execute. Pppoed(8) says: "The child proce=
ss
> will have standard input and standard output attached to the same
> netgraph(4) data socket (see ng_socket(4)) when started." Unfortunately,
> pppd has no analog of "direct" option for ppp. If we execute pppd without
> any tty_name, then it assumes "/dev/tty" and, as expected, exits after an
> error: "Failed to open /dev/tty: Device not configured".
>=20
> Since pppoed can execute any line, we can run any script or program before
> we invoke pppd. So, is there any way to open a pseudo-terminal that would
> connect to current standart input and standart output? Pppoed opens a ppp=
oe
> connection via ng_pppoe and ng_socket, all we need for pppd to work is a
> device (tty) representing the data socket.
>=20
> Is there any other way to get pppd and pppoed working together?
>=20
> Is there any other way to set up a fast pppoe server under FreeBSD?
Is there any particular reason why you insist on using the kernel
pppd? This whole question of speed is a shibboleth -- any tiny little
increase you might get between running user mode PPP vs kernel mode
PPP[1] is entirely outweighed by the fact that the limiting factor is
the available downstream bandwidth. Even if you have 10 Mb/s cable,
either of those PPP implementations will be able to pump data down the
link at full speed without breaking into a sweat.
If you need your PPPoE setup and running any time soon, I suggest
using the usermode PPP. On the other hand, patches to the kernel mode
PPP to add the functionality you need would certainly be well
received.
Cheers,
Matthew
[1] And don't assume that kernel mode PPP will automatically be faster
in this sense either. You'ld need to make some quite careful
measurements to be able to say for sure.
--=20
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks
Savill Way
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow
Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK
--NMuMz9nt05w80d4+
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFA8lBNiD657aJF7eIRArR3AJ9sVKuKax5JIRKXJ01CQi4l7RmsVgCeKnKo
cfEZqhT+hwitj9myND0aIGo=
=lV+E
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--NMuMz9nt05w80d4+--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040712084813.GB92187>