From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 7 09:03:30 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BA781065676 for ; Fri, 7 Nov 2008 09:03:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com (yw-out-2324.google.com [74.125.46.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADEDF8FC12 for ; Fri, 7 Nov 2008 09:03:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 9so457595ywe.13 for ; Fri, 07 Nov 2008 01:03:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:received:date:from :to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=DLwSclnRhGD8mHTn66uTktHANcxadrKTFZs8STg8iBw=; b=oOyFGGfS8t9ZATaWRxYMWnZp2yK4nvI19pB/88+MpPZtEduonvYHM8LKnPHrks4FdU 9WUsKeAG3YjzLL8RDfIeNXrUW1GxZ6h9qOZJmKva3RhdeWGTEF4sKVzCr5cmzmi6LIng CwrM1OEgSY+yAXuhga2vwQ/xGkXDHaIBKkJys= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=r7XSXjOFAm02mOee6P1DKUnQ2Z6bbWFqdu6cZ1jAm2Qy6NVVUh6fV5fcwLYeZ4/OuF p1T77UrVclszZfLCTfUtYjzwfNAnXQR3LE0wzxvtmEjRx596Ryvo2OMNiI+qQPs+q67C bEneSNeDCEpZr/WEvvvDEmQfD/LSupCEVJ/jk= Received: by 10.90.78.14 with SMTP id a14mr2887067agb.26.1226048608961; Fri, 07 Nov 2008 01:03:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr ([211.53.35.84]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 39sm3000501hse.19.2008.11.07.01.03.26 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 07 Nov 2008 01:03:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (localhost.cdnetworks.co.kr [127.0.0.1]) by michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id mA791Qdj012309 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 7 Nov 2008 18:01:26 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: (from yongari@localhost) by michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id mA791Pc1012308; Fri, 7 Nov 2008 18:01:25 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 18:01:25 +0900 From: Pyun YongHyeon To: g.cecchetti@sssup.it Message-ID: <20081107090125.GG11486@cdnetworks.co.kr> References: <49133B35.9040603@sssup.it> <20081107072201.GD11486@cdnetworks.co.kr> <4913EF93.6010006@sssup.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4913EF93.6010006@sssup.it> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Fabio Checconi , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Panics and freeze using age0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pyunyh@gmail.com List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2008 09:03:30 -0000 On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 11:34:43PM -0800, Gabriele Cecchetti wrote: > Pyun YongHyeon ha scritto: > [...] > > >Would you be more elaborate on this issue? Does it mean you have > >to manually up/down game with ifconfig(8) after boot? > > Yes, I need to do that. > Sometimes happen that even if the interface > is showed during the bootlog, then it is not showed by ifconfig. > Typing ifconfig again show the interface. > Then I've to down/up the interface and/or ping outside, like the > interface was sleeping. > Would you show me dmesg output? > > > Anyone with similar experience ? > > > age0 driver is well tested for production enviroment or not ? > > > [...] > > > Is better to buy another Intel card and going on using em0 driver ? > > > >Remember, all hardwares supported by age(4) are for consumer > >motherboards. Even if L1 has much better performance/design than > >that of its successor, L1E, it's still not for server market. > >The same is true for em(4). Since there are too many variants you > >may have to choose the best hardware model that is suited for your > >workload. > The other card I'm using is: > em0@pci0:5:1:0: class=0x020000 card=0x13768086 chip=0x107c8086 rev=0x05 > hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > device = 'PRO/1000 GT' > class = network > subclass = ethernet > > So, which card is the best buy for the server market ? Maybe other users in this list can answer that. -- Regards, Pyun YongHyeon