From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 19 00:23:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C2EE106566C for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 00:23:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dieterbsd@engineer.com) Received: from mailout-us.gmx.com (mailout-us.gmx.com [74.208.5.67]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6F1AB8FC0A for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 00:23:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12708 invoked by uid 0); 19 Sep 2011 00:23:05 -0000 Received: from 67.206.185.80 by rms-us017 with HTTP Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:23:03 -0400 From: "Dieter BSD" Message-ID: <20110919002304.219780@gmx.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Authenticated: #74169980 X-Flags: 0001 X-Mailer: GMX.com Web Mailer x-registered: 0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-GMX-UID: J/4XKrM0zVK0IR3RHjUzY24/Njh6dA4M Subject: Re: checksum offload X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 00:23:07 -0000 > The data sheet for intel 82576 advertises IP TX/RX checksum offload > but the driver does not set CSUM_IP in ifp->if_hwassist. Does this mean that > driver (and chip) do not support IP TX checksum offload or the support for > TX is not yet included in the driver? The first question is "is checksum offload a good idea?" There is less protection against errors.