From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Dec 19 16:53:22 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from finch-post-10.mail.demon.net (finch-post-10.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6055A37B436; Wed, 19 Dec 2001 16:50:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from ubik.demon.co.uk ([194.222.125.229]) by finch-post-10.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 16GrPR-0009L7-0A; Thu, 20 Dec 2001 00:50:07 +0000 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 03:52:34 +0000 To: babkin@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG From: Anthony Naggs Subject: Re: Found NFS data corruption bug... (was Re: NFS: How to make FreeBSD fall on its face in one easy step ) References: <200112130608.fBD689K49906@apollo.backplane.com> <20011213043851.Y56723-100000@turtle.looksharp.net> <20011218120531.A97576@lindt.urgle.com> <20011218184413.GB57822@dan.emsphone.com> <3C1FF11B.8F0C21FE@bellatlantic.net> In-Reply-To: <3C1FF11B.8F0C21FE@bellatlantic.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Turnpike Integrated Version 5.01 U Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In article <3C1FF11B.8F0C21FE@bellatlantic.net>, Sergey Babkin writes > >By the way the journaling filesystems don't neccessary guarantee that >you won't need fsck: for example, if VXFS crashes at a particularly >bad moment, it will require you to do "fsck -o full" which is as slow >as the fsck on traditional UFS. JFS still scores against traditional Unix file systems on large volumes, (e.g. Terabytes), as it requires very small amounts of virtual memory during a full fsck. ttfn, Tony To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message