From owner-freebsd-advocacy Wed Aug 5 11:09:50 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA29541 for freebsd-advocacy-outgoing; Wed, 5 Aug 1998 11:09:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA29536 for ; Wed, 5 Aug 1998 11:09:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA28494; Wed, 5 Aug 1998 11:08:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) To: Konrad Heuer cc: freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Extended / Replaced Utilities In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 05 Aug 1998 09:14:05 +0200." Date: Wed, 05 Aug 1998 11:08:23 -0700 Message-ID: <28490.902340503@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Now I observe that for example 2.2.6-RELEASE comes with a drastically (to > my mind) changed ftp client. I read in the release notes the 2.2.7-RELEASE > has an ls command with many new options. Excuse me - but now I seem to be > irritated. Where does FreeBSD go? Will it leave the traditional BSD line > which seems to be strong argument for using FreeBSD? No. I think you're over-reacting to a few cosmetic changes. Many people LIKE the new changes to FTP. Many people have requested a *new* flag for ls (which nobody is forced to use) which would allow filenames with weird characters in them to be displayed properly. Don't mistake "traditionalism" for "stagnation" since the latter is what you appear to be arguing for. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message