From owner-freebsd-doc Sat Nov 3 15:45:50 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from web21107.mail.yahoo.com (web21107.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.227.109]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 53A9937B406 for ; Sat, 3 Nov 2001 15:45:48 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20011103234548.57285.qmail@web21107.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [62.254.0.4] by web21107.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 03 Nov 2001 15:45:48 PST Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2001 15:45:48 -0800 (PST) From: Hiten Pandya Subject: [SUGGESTION] - use switch To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org hello, greetings, i was thinking that... wouldn't it be better if we used switches rather than hubs in those examples provided in the "Advanced Networking" chapter... example1: isdn-twisted-pair example2: natd the reason for this is that... for performance' sake, switches are better than hubs and there is a lot less congestion... i read that in a CCNA book ;) or we could write and we can also provide a suggestion that using a switch is better because it brings less congestion to the network... ===== thanks, regards, Hiten Pandya http://www.geocities.com/hitmaster2k __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Find a job, post your resume. http://careers.yahoo.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message