From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 23:16:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B22E3106566B; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 23:16:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FF538FC0A; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 23:16:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 2480556239; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 17:16:28 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 17:16:28 -0600 From: Mark Linimon To: Alexander Churanov Message-ID: <20120307231628.GB8613@lonesome.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: avg@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, dev2@heesakkers.info, boost-ports , sem@freebsd.org, martymac@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Boost ports update X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 23:16:28 -0000 On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 11:56:17PM +0300, Alexander Churanov wrote: > fail for other reasons > deskutils/kdepim4 > editors/koffice-kde4 > editors/libreoffice Marking these as broken isn't really an option (especially the first one). A lot more people rely on KDE than need the boost update. I hate to say it, but unless we can get the KDE folks to take a look (has someone emailed them?) we might have to have 2 different versions of boost until those 3 ports can be fixed. mcl