From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 05:27:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDDA316A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 05:27:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (vc4-2-0-87.dsl.netrack.net [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C95143D46 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 05:27:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1] (may be forged)) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jA95RFYh030987; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 22:27:15 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 22:27:47 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <20051108.222747.63047404.imp@bsdimp.com> To: nate@root.org From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <4367BCA6.5050609@root.org> References: <78F7D8FC-B5AA-4723-8336-E60F873D9414@club-internet.fr> <4367BCA6.5050609@root.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0 (harmony.bsdimp.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 08 Nov 2005 22:27:18 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ACPI and 3.0 specification X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 05:27:58 -0000 In message: <4367BCA6.5050609@root.org> Nate Lawson writes: : acpi 3.0 adds very little useful stuff unless you're interested in large : NUMA machines. We'd be better off implementing more support for those : systems in the main kernel and then acpi, not the other way around. PCIE and SATA sounds useful, and Ambient Light Sensor and User Presense device sounds both cool and ominous :-) I agree with you about numa. Warner