From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Feb 27 10:23:23 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 267AD1065675;
	Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:23:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D42AE13C458;
	Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:23:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 306C72095;
	Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:23:10 +0100 (CET)
X-Spam-Tests: AWL,URIBL_OB_SURBL
X-Spam-Learn: disabled
X-Spam-Score: 0.8/3.0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on tim.des.no
Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180])
	by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28E4B2091;
	Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:23:09 +0100 (CET)
From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
To: "Yen-Ming Lee" <leeym@leeym.com>
References: <86zltpzrxt.fsf@ds4.des.no>
	<759236930802242324o614598d1i1a8ca3cc8c12478c@mail.gmail.com>
	<86prulibf4.fsf@ds4.des.no>
	<759236930802250245j646f5be5k8382bedbfb2a7c1e@mail.gmail.com>
	<868x19i6ky.fsf@ds4.des.no>
	<759236930802251702h694c4f5bn2c7c87c7c47c7cc@mail.gmail.com>
	<86zltnsxap.fsf@ds4.des.no>
	<759236930802261046h216da59fv2bfdd616f601c325@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:23:08 +0100
In-Reply-To: <759236930802261046h216da59fv2bfdd616f601c325@mail.gmail.com>
	(Yen-Ming Lee's message of "Tue\, 26 Feb 2008 10\:46\:35 -0800")
Message-ID: <86ablmr94j.fsf@ds4.des.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/23.0.60 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: ports@freebsd.org, perl@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Port dependencies on p5-Test-*
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:23:23 -0000

> And I guess that you prefer to keep RUN_DEPENDS simple, and even
> ignore BUILD_DEPENDS at all. The users will get some warning messages
> for missing dependencies but it builds anyway. However, It means that
> the port maintainers need to somehow find out that which dependencies
> are really needed based on the modules installed, not the
> not-really-useful Makefile.PL or Build.PL, since the module authors
> may put everything there no matter they are really needed or needed
> for tests.

Thank you for showing that you neither understand the issue nor have any
interest in fixing it.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no