From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 24 14:33:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5496BE4D for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 14:33:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pa0-f54.google.com (mail-pa0-f54.google.com [209.85.220.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 030828FC14 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 14:33:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id bi1so430327pad.13 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 07:33:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ZWHwe1fKjPyf31t0vGtSm0EmlaNevpTnIsbTX16wfZ8=; b=jByInx16rUaM7Y/vMWXMm+u9+u1bUieHyWEyRCpxFiJGkjJQOIPTMZF5+NDSSoGg8I G+1/A8oBzdD40SJp/eo9Swl0eq+1nj8ALjOJNzaifO8RMbt6SjJNm1lLdZW8jAMIgC8w q7XzvN6wAhRIHi+OmZSrFtkhM7Wn7wZozEQAOE3KfEVkgNJx3cjhd+y+1doOPu7VVXMM epqhsLlzZtmcsYbtVj1BYsh1vmsp5j1hlA5pDnyyzd+HpGOWD+9NkTw52NRylQCxt/jG EdDDxo0kL4FEhH6lap17o42YeCUWAfaWEU+Gol6OmhdfHxaMz/EwCasHNLEEkvw9+ItQ QCZg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.135.168 with SMTP id pt8mr51365514pbb.24.1351089204358; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 07:33:24 -0700 (PDT) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.68.146.233 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 07:33:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5087F47B.50708@omnilan.de> References: <5087DFA1.7090001@omnilan.de> <5087F47B.50708@omnilan.de> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 07:33:24 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: BbZ_xLJ7GP9f5xGsN21zr2ZtRbY Message-ID: Subject: Re: every 2nd echo-request malformed when ping -s >4067 From: Adrian Chadd To: Harald Schmalzbauer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD Stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 14:33:25 -0000 On 24 October 2012 07:00, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > Sorry, forgot to mention that it's with 9.1-RC2. But I've seen this also > with 8.x long time ago. That time I had some nics not j9k-frame capable, > so I never had a look at the wire what's really going on... Ah, good. Not -HEAD. Phew. :-) Yeah, I'd fire off a PR. Which field is that? Fragment offset? Adrian