Date: Sat, 27 Dec 1997 05:56:04 +0100 (MET) From: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> To: hasty@rah.star-gate.com (Amancio Hasty) Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: I rather see the tcp/ip stack fixed than vat patched Message-ID: <199712270456.FAA07646@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> In-Reply-To: <199712270511.VAA01879@rah.star-gate.com> from "Amancio Hasty" at Dec 26, 97 09:10:41 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Amancio said: > I rather see the tcp/ip stack fixed than vat patched > > Tnks, > Amancio I brought out the things some time ago but there was not much reaction or agreement on what to do (yes, I know, I should learn CVS, get commit privs and act...) Furthermore I am not fully convinced that our udp stack is broken. For the first patch, having loopback on multicast socket is a configurable feature so there is no point in changin the default behaviour when 1-2 line change can fix the thing. For the ICMP response behaviour, I agree that there would be better to fix the kernel but the current behaviour is not totally unreasonable. Cheers Luigi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199712270456.FAA07646>